[arch-dev-public] cleanup testing repo
belanger at ASTRO.UMontreal.CA
Tue Jun 24 23:51:49 EDT 2008
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
>> Tom: are you still maintaining it? This is a couple of month old. The
>> current package in unstable is even older. IMO, it should be removed if
>> it's not actively maintained anymore. A couple months old svn package is
status of mplayer-svn ?
> #exiv2 rebuild
> digikam 0.9.3-2
> exiv2 0.16-2
> gimp-ufraw 0.13-2
> gwenview 1.4.2-2
> kipi-plugins 0.1.5beta1-3
> libkexiv2 0.1.6-3
Any objection in moving the exiv2 stuff to extra? They've been in testing
for nearly 3 months with no bug reports.
> lyx 1.5.5-1
> liborigin 20070926-1 already out of date
> libassuan 1.0.4-2
> psi 0.12.svn1160-1
> psi-i18n 0.12-1
> qca 2.0.0.svn817733-1
> qimageblitz 0.0.3.svn807093-1
> qt 4.4.0-4
> soprano 2.0.98-1
> strigi 0.5.10-1
Pierre: I believe you build these. Are they ready to be moved to extra?
> motion 3.2.9-1 moving it to extra would fix FS#10652
Any objection in moving this to extra?
> #old packages
> eigen 1.0.5.svn744389-1 tpowa
> exim 4.68-4 already out of date
> hpoj 0.91-12 tpowa
> kismet 2007_10_R1-1 j.chu
> nasm 2.01-1 pkrakture
> pinentry 0.7.3-2 tpowa already out of date
> redland 1.0.7-1 tpowa
> dnsmasq 2.41-2 already out of date
> kdelibs 3.5.9-4 pierre
> ##i686 diff
> #old pkgs
> ivtv-utils 1.0.2-1 paul already out of date
> qimageblitz 0.0.3.svn807093-1 !not in i686 only x86_64
Is there any of these old packages that can be moved to extra?
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the arch-dev-public