[arch-dev-public] ISO quality [was: kernel26 signoff]
aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 17:54:53 EDT 2008
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa at gmx.de> wrote:
> Am Montag, 24. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> > Splitting thread
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa at gmx.de> wrote:
> > > Am Montag, 24. März 2008 schrieb Simo Leone:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 07:28:13PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > > > > Users are happy with the new ISOs, just read the Forum thread about
> > > > > it.
> > > >
> > > > You know what. I don't care if the users are happy with the new ISOs.
> > > > That's right, I finally said it.
> > > > _I DON'T CARE_
> > > >
> > > > I don't care because _I_ am not happy with them. As someone who can
> > > > see that from a technological standpoint, it's a marvel that they even
> > > > work, that is, as a software developer, I'm ashamed to be associated
> > > > with such a shoddy product.
> > > >
> > > > I've offered alternatives, hell I've spent a lot of time offering
> > > > alternatives, built on more solid software enginerring principles
> > > > than "Users are Happy", but no one around here, save Dan and Aaron,
> > > > who just happen to be code contributors, seems to give a damn. What's
> > > > up with that?
> > >
> > > You never started to create ISOs nor you wanted to create them.
> > > This topic here is about kernel26 signoff and i would be fine if people
> > > would stay on topic.
> > Please see here back in October:
> > http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-October/002616.html
> Ok no big deal, Simo will create the next ISO.
More information about the arch-dev-public