[arch-dev-public] ISO quality [was: kernel26 signoff]
t.powa at gmx.de
Mon Mar 24 17:50:13 EDT 2008
Am Montag, 24. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> Splitting thread
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Am Montag, 24. März 2008 schrieb Simo Leone:
> > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 07:28:13PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > > > Users are happy with the new ISOs, just read the Forum thread about
> > > > it.
> > >
> > > You know what. I don't care if the users are happy with the new ISOs.
> > > That's right, I finally said it.
> > > _I DON'T CARE_
> > >
> > > I don't care because _I_ am not happy with them. As someone who can
> > > see that from a technological standpoint, it's a marvel that they even
> > > work, that is, as a software developer, I'm ashamed to be associated
> > > with such a shoddy product.
> > >
> > > I've offered alternatives, hell I've spent a lot of time offering
> > > alternatives, built on more solid software enginerring principles
> > > than "Users are Happy", but no one around here, save Dan and Aaron,
> > > who just happen to be code contributors, seems to give a damn. What's
> > > up with that?
> > You never started to create ISOs nor you wanted to create them.
> > This topic here is about kernel26 signoff and i would be fine if people
> > would stay on topic.
> Please see here back in October:
Ok no big deal, Simo will create the next ISO.
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
tpowa at archlinux.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the arch-dev-public