[arch-dev-public] [signoff] fuse 2.7.4-1

Ronald van Haren pressh at gmail.com
Mon Oct 20 02:52:12 EDT 2008

On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Jan de Groot <jan at jgc.homeip.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 16:23 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote:
>>> Hi devs,
>>> In testing for both architectures. Please signoff.
>> Why is this package still in core? Nothing in core depends on it and
>> it's not a critical base package.
> Is it in the [core] repository, but not in the base group? If so, I
> think it has reason to be there- it can easily be viewed as a core
> component of a system install.
> Pushing everything down to extra doesn't really solve any identified
> problem. Cleaning out the base group is reasonable.
> -Dan

Yes it is in the core repository but not it the base group.

As I see it the package makes sence in either the core or the extra
repo. Core because it is an underlying lib of quite a few things which
could possibly break those (although the packages that depend on fuse
are not really mission critical). Extra because of what Jan said.

If more people think it should really go to extra I'm happy to move
it. Opinions?


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list