[arch-dev-public] [signoff] fuse 2.7.4-1
aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Mon Oct 20 13:10:32 EDT 2008
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Ronald van Haren <pressh at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Jan de Groot <jan at jgc.homeip.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 16:23 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote:
>>>> Hi devs,
>>>> In testing for both architectures. Please signoff.
>>> Why is this package still in core? Nothing in core depends on it and
>>> it's not a critical base package.
>> Is it in the [core] repository, but not in the base group? If so, I
>> think it has reason to be there- it can easily be viewed as a core
>> component of a system install.
>> Pushing everything down to extra doesn't really solve any identified
>> problem. Cleaning out the base group is reasonable.
> Yes it is in the core repository but not it the base group.
> As I see it the package makes sence in either the core or the extra
> repo. Core because it is an underlying lib of quite a few things which
> could possibly break those (although the packages that depend on fuse
> are not really mission critical). Extra because of what Jan said.
> If more people think it should really go to extra I'm happy to move
> it. Opinions?
Hmmm... personally, it seems more like it belongs in extra,
conceptually, but it is a kernel module which also seems to point to
core. I'm neutral on it, so I say we do a little informal vote on
Should fuse stay in core? Y/N
More information about the arch-dev-public