[arch-dev-public] our FAT support and Microsoft

Andreas Radke a.radke at arcor.de
Fri Apr 3 08:09:41 EDT 2009

Am Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:25:36 +0200
schrieb Thomas Bächler <thomas at archlinux.org>:

> Andreas Radke schrieb:
> > http://www.linux-foundation.org/weblogs/jzemlin/2009/03/31/on-the-tomtom-settlement-microsoft-rolls-back-its-%E2%80%9Copen%E2%80%9D-promises/ 
> I just read that article and it failed to make a point at all! What
> is it actually saying?
> > I haven't done further investigations but it seems we should take
> > care about keep supporting the FAT file system.
> > 
> > How is the state with NTFS? Is the license situation there more
> > safe?
> Okay, you also fail to make any point. Please explain what this
> posting is about.

We should just be prepared that M$ might soon start to sue any
company/distro that has no contract with them.

If there's nothing to be afraid all is fine.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20090403/1093731c/attachment.pgp>

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list