[arch-dev-public] our FAT support and Microsoft

[Thomas Bächler]

Andreas Radke schrieb:
> http://www.linux-foundation.org/weblogs/jzemlin/2009/03/31/on-the-tomtom-settlement-microsoft-rolls-back-its-%E2%80%9Copen%E2%80%9D-promises/ 

I just read that article and it failed to make a point at all! What is 
it actually saying?

> I haven't done further investigations but it seems we should take care
> about keep supporting the FAT file system.
> 
> How is the state with NTFS? Is the license situation there more safe?

Okay, you also fail to make any point. Please explain what this posting 
is about.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20090403/e34e7341/attachment.pgp>