[arch-dev-public] introducing kernel26-lts

Firmicus Firmicus at gmx.net
Wed Aug 26 16:00:11 EDT 2009

Dale Blount a écrit :
>> I don't think that it needs to go in core to get signoffs.  We could
>> put it in extra and make an exception (i.e. require signoff).  The
>> only advantage of putting it in core is to offer it as an alternative
>> kernel for the iso.
> Is there a disadvantage to putting it in core?  I'd say if I was going
> to install the lts kernel on a server, It'd be annoying to have to
> install using kernel26 then install lts from extra later.  Having it
> available on the install CD would be useful.  Not to mention core
> explicitly requires signoffs which solves that problem also.
> Dale
+1 from me for putting it in core

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list