[arch-dev-public] boost rebuild

[Pierre Schmitz]

On Wednesday 08 July 2009 05:18:50 K. Piche wrote:
> That was me.  I've tested a good number of the packages and most don't
> require a rebuild which is odd since in the past it was always a hassle.
> smc only required a rebuild cause the boost versioned dep had a '=' and
> not '>='.  I'll finish this up.

Just remove those packages from the list that don't need a rebuild.

> Also I think we should drop bmpx if no one has objections.  Doesn't work
> well and hasn't been updated in more than a year.

Sure, why not. This would also include bmp-musepack and bmp-wma which was not 
rebuild since 2005.

-- 

Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre