[arch-dev-public] Replacing qtparted with partitionman from aur?

[Thomas Bächler]

Tobias Powalowski schrieb:
> Hi folks:
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14745
> I haven't used qtparted in ages and 
> it seems partitionman seems more up to date and developed.

We might add it, but as partitionman is not a successor of qtparted, a 
"replaces" directive seems wrong. I don't use qtparted and don't know 
partitionman, but I have no objections to adding one or dropping the 
other - if nobody else objects, do as you think.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20090521/76667c2a/attachment.pgp>