[arch-dev-public] Replacing qtparted with partitionman from aur?
thomas at archlinux.org
Thu May 21 13:11:37 EDT 2009
Tobias Powalowski schrieb:
> Hi folks:
> I haven't used qtparted in ages and
> it seems partitionman seems more up to date and developed.
We might add it, but as partitionman is not a successor of qtparted, a
"replaces" directive seems wrong. I don't use qtparted and don't know
partitionman, but I have no objections to adding one or dropping the
other - if nobody else objects, do as you think.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the arch-dev-public