[arch-dev-public] Replacing qtparted with partitionman from aur?

[Tobias Powalowski]

Am Donnerstag 21 Mai 2009 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> Tobias Powalowski schrieb:
> > Hi folks:
> > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14745
> > I haven't used qtparted in ages and
> > it seems partitionman seems more up to date and developed.
>
> We might add it, but as partitionman is not a successor of qtparted, a
> "replaces" directive seems wrong. I don't use qtparted and don't know
> partitionman, but I have no objections to adding one or dropping the
> other - if nobody else objects, do as you think.
I wouldn't add a replace for it just drop qtparted from extra

-- 
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tpowa at archlinux.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20090521/87df226d/attachment.pgp>