[arch-dev-public] should be esound an optdepends?
Allan McRae
allan at archlinux.org
Tue Oct 20 21:19:33 EDT 2009
Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> >From FS#16502:
> With GNOME 2.28 arriving, it's time to make esound an optional
> package, which is currently not the case.
>
Do you want to give us an explanation why this would be a good idea?
> Here is the list of the packages which requires esound. I think for
> all of them that esound should be an optional dependency (except maybe
> enlightenment?).
>
> * bmp
> * cinelerra-cv
> * enlightenment
> * epplet-base
> * freeciv
> * gmerlin
> * gstreamer0.10-good-plugins
> * kvirc
> * kvm
> * libgnome
> * qemu
> * vice
> * xine-lib
> * xmms
Also, you forgot about all the packages the depend on "esd".
Allan
More information about the arch-dev-public
mailing list