[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 19-02-2010

Eric Bélanger snowmaniscool at gmail.com
Sat Feb 20 10:39:50 EST 2010

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have no problem with removing it, especially considering we've always been
> fine with makedepends in other repos.

Another solution would be to use a whitelist so that the packages with
out-of-repo makedepends that we are aware of, and agree upon, won't be
listed in the report.

> PS sent from my phone, sorry if the format blows. I think it's top
> posting...
> On Feb 19, 2010 7:14 PM, "Xavier Chantry" <chantry.xavier at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:00 PM, <repomaint at archlinux.org> wrote:
>> Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends...
> Do we want to clutter the output of integrity check every week with
> makedepends repo hierarchy, which seems to get very little interest
> and attention (for good reasons) ?
> It's a growing list, and it's the most useless section but takes more
> than half of the total report length.
> PS : aaron in CC because I think I cannot post to arch-dev-public with
> that mail :)

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list