[arch-dev-public] Pacman Architecture option (was: [signoff] pacman 3.4.0-2)

Thomas Bächler thomas at archlinux.org
Tue Jun 22 11:55:59 EDT 2010


Am 22.06.2010 17:42, schrieb Dan McGee:
> This is the last thing I will say on this. Where the heck were you
> guys 11 months ago? Surely not following development, but you want to
> piss about it now.
> 
> Discussion:
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-July/008965.html
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-July/008968.html
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-July/008970.html
> 
> Patches (with no feedback, mind you):
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-August/009193.html

I do read pacman-dev on occasion, but not regularly, and I don't follow
each patch thread or new feature. I heard that the Architecture option
was coming, but was never too concerned with the details (just random
happiness about it) - I didn't even know it would be an option, but
thought it was just default behaviour.
I even discussed the issue with Xavier I think, maybe it was Allan, it's
too long ago.

If you read my emails, you will see that I did not complain a single
time, but rather wanted to know what the reasoning behind this decision
was (which I'd still like to know btw).

And while I think that this should be changed to the way I suggested
(which would be a trivial change), for the reasons I posted, I can live
with it either way.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20100622/9ac004bb/attachment.bin>


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list