[arch-dev-public] Pacman Architecture option (was: [signoff] pacman 3.4.0-2)
thomas at archlinux.org
Tue Jun 22 11:55:59 EDT 2010
Am 22.06.2010 17:42, schrieb Dan McGee:
> This is the last thing I will say on this. Where the heck were you
> guys 11 months ago? Surely not following development, but you want to
> piss about it now.
> Patches (with no feedback, mind you):
I do read pacman-dev on occasion, but not regularly, and I don't follow
each patch thread or new feature. I heard that the Architecture option
was coming, but was never too concerned with the details (just random
happiness about it) - I didn't even know it would be an option, but
thought it was just default behaviour.
I even discussed the issue with Xavier I think, maybe it was Allan, it's
too long ago.
If you read my emails, you will see that I did not complain a single
time, but rather wanted to know what the reasoning behind this decision
was (which I'd still like to know btw).
And while I think that this should be changed to the way I suggested
(which would be a trivial change), for the reasons I posted, I can live
with it either way.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the arch-dev-public