[arch-dev-public] blacklisting issue, perhaps initscripts or kernel 3.0 related

[Thomas Bächler]

Am 01.08.2011 17:23, schrieb Dave Reisner:
> It's also not recommended by upstream, as per modprobe.conf(5). We
> shouldn't make any guarantees about module load order. What's the
> problem we're trying to solve with this juggling? Is this bandaiding and
> issue that should be taken upstream to the kernel folk? Or, is this some
> pre-emptive attack against hardware being claimed by the wrong module,
> in which case we should be leaving it up the user to figure out which
> module they want to use...

Apparently, it is recommended upstream to load ehci before uhci or ohci
(which userspace cannot safely guarantee) and actual bugs are caused if
we don't. I don't like this, but we couldn't think of another solution.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20110801/66b7e1fc/attachment.asc>