[arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.2-1, net-tools-1.60-15, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2

[Eric Bélanger]

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Tom Gundersen <teg at jklm.no> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool at gmail.com> wrote:
>> That's what I believe.  I didn't mentionned it but dmesg contains
>> output saying that the raid was assemble and all mirrors are active.
>> So despite the error message from udevd, the kernel still manage to
>> assemble the raid array. Also, I can't find the hook or config file
>> that contains the mdadm command line displayed in the error message.
>> I looked in /etc and /lib/initcpio but it's not there.
>
> It is called from udev (both in the initramfs, which fails, and in the
> real fs, which succeeds). The rule is
> /lib/udev/rules.d/64-md-raid.rules. Could it be that your initramfs
> lacks some modules? I guess Thomas would know this better than me...

I could try my fallback initcpio. I don't remember if I tried that.

My /etc/mkinitcpio.conf has:
MODULES="pata_amd ata_generic sata_nv sata_sil24 floppy dm-mod raid1 raid456"

HOOKS="base udev autodetect pata scsi sata usbinput keymap mdadm lvm2
filesystems"
md=0,/dev/sda1,/dev/sdb1 md=1,/dev/sda2,/dev/sdb2



>
>> If I'm the only one with the problem, you can also keep things as they
>> are now, i.e. not support /usr on a separate partition. As I'll be
>> moving my /usr, that problem will become moot.
>
> There probably will be more affected people once it reaches [core], so
> we should either decide not to support separate /usr, or fix it.
>
> -t
>