seblu at seblu.net
Fri Aug 2 09:38:00 EDT 2013
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Pierre Schmitz <pierre at archlinux.de> wrote:
> Am 02.08.2013 14:14, schrieb Bartłomiej Piotrowski:
>> On 2013-08-02 08:41, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> If you abuse the split package this way, you still have to rebuild and
> publish both split packages if e.g. the passenger module requires a
Yep. We will drop the split package.
> In general I am not sure if there is a sane way to package these build
> time modules. It would be impossible to cover all the combinations and
> external "modules" a user might want. Is it a good idea to provide a
> separate package that has all kinds of different modules built in?
There is no perfect solution with build time modules. It's broken by design.
> Probably not. And people who need certain non-standard modules are
> better off compiling their own package.
> I would probably provide a vanilla package with sensible defaults and
> make it easy for people to extend on that.
So, I think we'll rollback to one package co-maintained by Bartholomej and me,
with interesting optional modules and auth-pam (I use it).
Nothing should block a nginx update, so if auth-pam is incompatible,
it will be dropped.
Passenger external module will be dropped as it causes too frequent rebuild.
Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
More information about the arch-dev-public