[arch-dev-public] BIND10? No, thanks.

[Ike Devolder]

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 07:05:42PM +1100, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2013-03-09 20:01:22 +0100] Ike Devolder:
> > Just a small question, will we provide migration paths for people using
> > bind as nameserver in their internal networks ?
> 
> Do you mean as a caching name server? For this, just install unbound,
> run the daemon service, and you're good to put 127.0.0.1 in resolv.conf.
> 
> The alternative to bind as an authoritative name server is nsd. The zone
> files it uses are the same as bind's, but the daemon configuration is
> slightly different. It's really not hard though, but if you can't figure
> it out Google will find migration scripts, etc. Of course, anybody is
> free to maintain bind in any repo or the AUR - it just won't be me.
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> -- 
> Gaetan

i was just wondering for user convenience, i don't really care which
nameserver i can and must use in my local network.

-- 
Ike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20130311/6de09ace/attachment.asc>