[arch-dev-public] Artwork Team?
Allan McRae
allan at archlinux.org
Sat Oct 5 21:46:49 EDT 2013
On 05/10/13 14:06, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2013-10-05 05:17:18 +0200] Jan Alexander Steffens:
>> I don't think these packages should be in the AUR, given that they
>> just repackage content from our FTP for access via pacman.
>
> There are tons of PKGBUILD on the AUR whose sole purpose is to package a
> single script which is readily available on the Web. I see no problem
> with that.
>
>> Whenever someone uploads new artwork to our FTP, they should also
>> update these packages. Otherwise, they are pretty much zero
>> maintenance.
>
> I understand that we are supposed to be the upstream on this, but since
> no developer or trusted user has shown interest in maintaining these
> packages, why not let users do it? Things like desktop manager themes
> could be improved by the community. Ultimately if neither official Arch
> packagers or users care, those packages could just be plain removed...
>
I have had an email pointed out that these artworks carry our TM and we
may want to consider the consequences of not controlling them ourselves.
Allan
More information about the arch-dev-public
mailing list