[arch-dev-public] On pushing a standalone opencv 3.x

Fri Dec 4 17:20:44 UTC 2015

Hi

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Rashif Ray Rahman <schiv at archlinux.org> wrote:
> If there are no objections, I'll go ahead and push 3.x, which should
> co-exist fine with 2.x. I suppose it's OK to break our naming
> convention in cases like these.

Why to break it? Just push new opencv and opencv-2 to staging and
create a TODO to rebuild all the dependencies.