[arch-dev-public] switching to systemd-stable

Laurent Carlier lordheavym at gmail.com
Sat Jul 1 18:15:26 UTC 2017

Le samedi 1 juillet 2017, 19:59:49 CEST Christian Hesse a écrit :
> Dave Reisner <d at falconindy.com> on Sat, 2017/07/01 13:22:
> > One potentially bikeshed-worthy question is versioning. Do we count
> > commits and modify the pkgver every time we build from the repo, e.g.
> > 233.23-1 (meaning pkgrel=1 of a v233 build containing 23 backports), or
> > do we simply keep the base pkgver true to upstream and increment pkgrel
> > every time we release, e.g. 233-5 (meaning pkgrel=5 of some build of the
> > v233 stable branch).
> > 
> > [1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable
> I like the versioning to indicate what the package contains... So voting for
> the inclusion of commit count. The only downside will be that people will
> flag the package out-of-date for every new commit in the stable branch. :-p

I agree, commit count is the best choice.

Laurent Carlier
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20170701/c10eabb4/attachment.asc>

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list