[arch-dev-public] switching to systemd-stable

Bruno Pagani bruno.n.pagani at gmail.com
Sat Jul 1 23:23:53 UTC 2017

Le 01/07/2017 à 20:15, Laurent Carlier via arch-dev-public a écrit :

> Le samedi 1 juillet 2017, 19:59:49 CEST Christian Hesse a écrit :
>> Dave Reisner <d at falconindy.com> on Sat, 2017/07/01 13:22:
>>> One potentially bikeshed-worthy question is versioning. Do we count
>>> commits and modify the pkgver every time we build from the repo, e.g.
>>> 233.23-1 (meaning pkgrel=1 of a v233 build containing 23 backports), or
>>> do we simply keep the base pkgver true to upstream and increment pkgrel
>>> every time we release, e.g. 233-5 (meaning pkgrel=5 of some build of the
>>> v233 stable branch).
>>> [1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable
>> I like the versioning to indicate what the package contains... So voting for
>> the inclusion of commit count. The only downside will be that people will
>> flag the package out-of-date for every new commit in the stable branch. :-p
> I agree, commit count is the best choice.

Just in case more voices matter, I agree too. ;)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 520 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20170702/86022e12/attachment-0001.asc>

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list