[arch-dev-public] Arch Linux Docker / Vagrant: Current situation

[Santiago Torres-Arias]

Understood.

Although I don't exactly know what's the "original purpose" I'll try to
make sure no big radical changes are made without consensus from the
community :)

Thanks both of you!
-Santiago.

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 03:41:56PM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Yeah, that was the "and please don't get it the wrong way" part which
> obviously did not work. I thought I just put this out there as I
> already got PRs and mails from different people who wanted to make the
> image more minimal by removing files from packages or provide
> different images for all kind of uses cases.
> 
> I just wanted to avoid frustration beforehand but not discourage your
> work. I probably failed on this one :-)
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Pierre
> 
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via
> arch-dev-public <arch-dev-public at archlinux.org> wrote:
> > On 2018-03-12 05:33, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> >> Thanks for digging this up again. You may use the github issue or
> >> project system to plan the different steps. Also (and please don't get
> >> it the wrong way) let's keep the purpose I intended for our Docker
> >> image intact.
> >
> > No one has suggested changing "the purpose". I'm not sure what is
> > unclear in Santiago's mail.
> >
> > Bartłomiej
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20180312/45edbff4/attachment.asc>