[arch-dev-public] packaging hunspell dictionaries converted for qt5-webengine
Eli Schwartz
eschwartz at archlinux.org
Wed Sep 4 14:42:34 UTC 2019
On 9/3/19 4:47 AM, David Runge wrote:
> Not that it is of our direct concern, but qt5-webengine seems to suffer
> from unresolved questionable licensing issues, which is why e.g.
> Parabola doesn't package it [1]. I don't know the specifics, but assume,
> that it is due to the Chromium license [2].
>
> Best,
> David
>
> [1] https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=qt5-
> [2] https://github.com/qt/qtwebengine/blob/5.12/LICENSE.Chromium
I mean, if we're concerned about that we should remove the chromium
package first, *then* remove qt5-webengine (and electron).
Since it is a complex issue, I will mostly drop links and expect
interested people to read up on it, rather than giving a summary myself.
The GNU FSDG considers chromium to be "not provably free":
https://libreplanet.org/wiki/List_of_software_that_does_not_respect_the_Free_System_Distribution_Guidelines#chromium-browser
Original chromium project bug report:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=28291
Parabola meta-bug tracking their general stance on chromium and affected
packages: https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1167
What Qt developers think about this:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374808#c4
https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qtwebengine/2017-January/000409.html
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1601 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20190904/d385f8cd/attachment.sig>
More information about the arch-dev-public
mailing list