[arch-general] Someone shoot sergej

Sergej Pupykin pupykin.s at gmail.com
Mon Dec 1 06:43:16 EST 2008


It is ok, but why replacing?

I spend ~4h per week to maintain all my packages. It is not problem to 
add high voted packages to community.
> To summarize the TU meetings (logs have been posted...), it is about 
> replacing very low usage/unused packages in [community] with those 
> with higher usage in unsupported.  I.e. optimizing our resource usage.
> People with opinions on this should be discussing this in the 
> dedicated thread(s) on aur-general so the discussion is easier to 
> follow.  This thread is too much of a direct attack on one individual 
> to be productive.  Go through all the packages with low vote on AUR 
> and low usage from pkgstats and you will find that Sergej has around 
> as many packages as would be expected given how many he maintains.  
> Has anyone manually checked what proportion of his low vote packages 
> are not dependencies for other packages?  This need to be dealt with 
> on a whole group basis, not an individual basis.



More information about the arch-general mailing list