[arch-general] Someone shoot sergej
Sergej Pupykin
pupykin.s at gmail.com
Mon Dec 1 06:43:16 EST 2008
It is ok, but why replacing?
I spend ~4h per week to maintain all my packages. It is not problem to
add high voted packages to community.
> To summarize the TU meetings (logs have been posted...), it is about
> replacing very low usage/unused packages in [community] with those
> with higher usage in unsupported. I.e. optimizing our resource usage.
> People with opinions on this should be discussing this in the
> dedicated thread(s) on aur-general so the discussion is easier to
> follow. This thread is too much of a direct attack on one individual
> to be productive. Go through all the packages with low vote on AUR
> and low usage from pkgstats and you will find that Sergej has around
> as many packages as would be expected given how many he maintains.
> Has anyone manually checked what proportion of his low vote packages
> are not dependencies for other packages? This need to be dealt with
> on a whole group basis, not an individual basis.
More information about the arch-general
mailing list