[arch-general] Can we use the "Firefox" name?

Jan de Groot jan at jgc.homeip.net
Wed Jun 11 02:12:18 EDT 2008


On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 01:57 -0400, Yonathan Dossow wrote:
> IMHO, to avoid trademark violations we should use IceWeasel.

Would it make sense to distribute an iceweasel package with a binary
inside it called "firefox"? Mozilla Corporation should fix their binary
names, installation prefix, etc to get us to drop the firefox package
name.





More information about the arch-general mailing list