[arch-general] Can we use the "Firefox" name?

[Lukáš Jirkovský]

I've a small dumb question.
Why not use official branded version when there are many licensing
problems? According to KISS and Arch philosophy (use upstream apps and
not to patch unless necessary) this should be a good way.

Regards
Lukas '6xx' Jirkovsky

2008/6/11 Sam Gwydir <gwydir8 at gmail.com>:
> On Wed Jun 11, 2008 at 04:3341PM +0200, Xavier wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Alper KANAT <alperkanat at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > As a user, I really dislike the name Iceweasel... I really dislike its logo
>> > and so on...
>> >
>>
>> Good for you! Then what?
>
> Then find a different name. Iceweasel isn't our only alternative.
>
>