[arch-general] ClamAV should be update to 0.93
Tino Reichardt
list-arch at mcmilk.de
Sun May 4 16:19:47 EDT 2008
* Alessio Bolognino <themolok.ml at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun 2008-05-04 12:47 , Tino Reichardt wrote:
> > * pyther <pyther at pyther.net> wrote:
> > > > * Tino Reichardt <list-arch at mcmilk.de> wrote:
> > > >> Hello list,
> > > >>
> > > >> clamav should be updated.
> > > >
> > > > Why does the update of clamav take so long ?
> > > >
> > > > Should I build a new package ?
> > > >
> > > Because the developers have a life, if you need a new package use abs
> > > and compile it.
> >
> > If they don't have the time to be a maintainer for some package, they
> > shouldn't be the maintainer of it!
> >
> > My time is also short and thats the reason why I am no trusted user or
> > the maintainer of packages like clamav.
>
> Being a security update it should be somewhat "high priority", if the
> maintainer didn't update it yet is because he simply don't have the time
> to do so (and test it).
This exactly is the point! Versions before 0.92 are vulnerable, that
should be fixed, as soon as possible.
> Your whining is not helping anyone; bear in mind that the number of
> devs/TUs is limited and they have to manage a huge number of packages.
> If you want to help someway, you could update the package, test it and
> send the sources (PKGBUILD and other stuff) to the maintainer or maybe
> even in this mailing list.
I did not whine! I build it myself clamav by just replacing the $pkgver
on my private x86_64 box. I just wanted to call some attention.
But Arch Linux is known to be very up to date on nearly all packages.
Why not on that security realted issue ?
When clamav 0.94 is released, where should I upload the new PKGBUILD
including the binaries for x86_64 and i686 ?
Sorry for my english, it isn't the best :)
--
regards, TR
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20080504/aa4b1663/attachment.pgp>
More information about the arch-general
mailing list