[arch-general] In defense of pacman.static

ludovic coues couesl at gmail.com
Thu Aug 6 04:32:42 EDT 2009


It's a problem with the default pacman.conf I suppose.
By default, pacman is configured to upgrade itself first. If he have upgrade
itself, but forget to bring dependencies with it, it's a shame.

I think this is a bug with the FirstSync option in pacman.conf


More information about the arch-general mailing list