[arch-general] In defense of pacman.static

[Allan McRae]

ludovic coues wrote:
> It's a problem with the default pacman.conf I suppose.
> By default, pacman is configured to upgrade itself first. If he have upgrade
> itself, but forget to bring dependencies with it, it's a shame.
>
> I think this is a bug with the FirstSync option in pacman.conf
>   

Its not actually...  it is a bug with pacman's deps.  It requires 
libarchive>=2.7.0-2 and not just 2.7.0

Allan