[arch-general] Another rant on arch way abuse and false promises

[Arvid Picciani]

Jan de Groot wrote:

> Dbus support in wpa-supplicant is not broken. A not working
> networkmanager is broken. We have to make a choice here, and having
> broken software isn't the right choice, is it?
> 

dbus is indeed broken. so its a different tradeof then you suggest.
Additionaly,  i don't intent to argue about that.

My point is that the idea of archlinux is not centered around the gnome 
desktop, but rather around upstream defaults.


-- 
Arvid
Asgaard Technologies