[arch-general] [OT] What is wrong with DBus anyway?

[Dieter Plaetinck]

On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:32:46 +0000
Pierre Chapuis <catwell at archlinux.us> wrote:


> There is indeed a D-Bus protocol [1], and I don't see why anybody
> would be against that, because a protocol is a written document and
> not a piece of software: it doesn't enforce an implementation.
> 

protocols can be bloated and or badly designed.
not saying dbus is, i have not enough experience with it.

Dieter