[arch-general] closed bugs, open comments?
baho-utot at columbus.rr.com
Wed Feb 18 16:03:18 EST 2009
Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 04:46:19PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
>> Nicolas Bigaouette wrote:
>>> I totally second that. It is really frustrating as a bug reporting user to
>>> end the discussion like this.
>>> It really looks like a "shut-up and stop annoying us" thing...
>>> I know it did not gave me the motivation to open other bugs.
>>> I don't see why the discussion should be closed when the bug is. As Damjan
>>> said, some useful information can still be provided even if the bug is
>>> 2009/2/16 Damjan Georgievski <gdamjan at gmail.com>
>> Which is why I don't submit bug reports anymore.
> Instead of +1'ing this could you provide examples instead?
No not really, as I am done with this and I am not going to argue with
anyone about this.
It's just that I came looking for help and got slammed one too many times.
Now I either go the the news groups for help or fix it my self. If I
don't get a solution then I skip the package and move on.
> >From my experience phrakture does the exact same opposite than what you
> are "accusing" him of. Usually he doesnt close the bugs even if he
> solves them. :P
More information about the arch-general