[arch-general] Moonlight 1.0

[Amanai]

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:39:40 -0800, stefan-husmann at t-online.de  
<stefan-husmann at t-online.de> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I agree perfectly. But  it would be the correct way to handle things
> like that, and would put some noise away from this list.
>
> BTW, the new rules for the TUs would even forbid to put it to
> community without discussion. The devs might have some similar rules for
> putting something new to extra.
>
> Regards Stefan
>

New rules? The voting never worked and will never working!


On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:18:59 -0800, Aaron Griffin  
<aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Agreed. We're not in the habit of adding packages to extra simply
> because of one noisy user. We need to ensure people will actually use
> it so we're not wasting our time.
>

It was just one question if "moonlight" will pe a part of Archlinux and  
you call me "noisy user"! You must be a typical american overweight kid to  
say this! Did I wake you up in your dreamworld?


On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:14:49 -0800, Vesa Kaihlavirta <vpkaihla at gmail.com>  
wrote:


>
> I gotta say, even with all the usual MS distrust that I've been
> carrying around since MS-DOS 3.x, on the surface Moonlight looks much
> more promising than the clusterfsck that is Flash. I'd be interested
> in at least giving it a shot.
>
> --vk
>

This sounds mutch better,