[arch-general] Moonlight 1.0

[stefan-husmann at t-online.de]

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:09:44 +0100
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
> From: Amanai <amanai at freenet.de>
> To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux" <arch-general at archlinux.org>

> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:39:40 -0800, stefan-husmann at t-online.de
> <stefan-husmann at t-online.de> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I agree perfectly. But  it would be the correct way to handle things
> > like that, and would put some noise away from this list.
> > 
> > BTW, the new rules for the TUs would even forbid to put it to
> > community without discussion. The devs might have some similar rules
> > for putting something new to extra.
> > 
> > Regards Stefan
> > 
> > 
> 
> New rules? The voting never worked and will never working!
> 
> 
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:18:59 -0800, Aaron Griffin
> <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Agreed. We're not in the habit of adding packages to extra simply
> > because of one noisy user. We need to ensure people will actually
> > use it so we're not wasting our time.
> > 
> > 
> 
> It was just one question if "moonlight" will pe a part of Archlinux
> and you call me "noisy user"! You must be a typical american
> overweight kid to say this! Did I wake you up in your dreamworld?
> 
> 
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:14:49 -0800, Vesa Kaihlavirta
> <vpkaihla at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > I gotta say, even with all the usual MS distrust that I've been
> > carrying around since MS-DOS 3.x, on the surface Moonlight looks
> > much more promising than the clusterfsck that is Flash. I'd be
> > interested in at least giving it a shot.
> > 
> > --vk
> > 
> > 
> 
> This sounds mutch better,
> 
> 
They may work or not, rules are rules.