[arch-general] phonon: gstreamer support will be dropped
Alberto Gonzalez
info at gnebu.es
Fri Jan 23 10:22:27 EST 2009
Hi,
[ This is in response to the thread in arch-devel here:
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2009-January/009971.html ]
Regarding gstreamer support in phonon I'd like to add my 2 cents:
When you install KDE, you get the xine-phonon backend (and only the
xine-phonon backend) by default. If someone wants to use gstreamer he must
explicitly install it and then go to KDE control center and choose gstreamer.
So it's not so much that you're dropping support for it (it is not supported
by default anyway), it's rather the ability for anyone who wants to use it to
be able to do it what you're removing. What's the advantage of that?
Some people like xine better, some don't. If you use a laptop and care about
battery life you have to dislike xine for sure. In KDE3 I had to disable the
sound system. In KDE4 I had to switch to gstreamer backend. At least in KDE
4.2 they have fixed this to certain extent (i.e., no more 100's of CPU
wakeups per seconds on an idle desktop). However, I encourage you to simply
open Dragon player and leave it there idle while looking at powertop (and
compare the same while using gstreamer backend). You can also play an mp3 in
a phonon-based player and see the difference between xine and gstreamer.
By the end of the day, discussing the strengths of each backend is not so
interesting. Xine is the default and that's good. But why remove the freedom
to change it to gstreamer for those who want it? As far as I know, allowing
to use gstreamer doesn't affect in any way to those using xine, does it?
Gstreamer has its problems, but it's used by all the gnome people (most
Ubuntu/Fedora users and more) so it's can't be that bad. Not as to not allow
users to use it if they want to.
Thanks,
Alberto.
More information about the arch-general
mailing list