[arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?

[Ed Jobs]

On Monday 13 July 2009 11:49, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
> to the dev:
> why not rename vi package to nvi ?

+1 to that

-- 
If we could implement a physical system with the storage capacity that 
matches the 128-bit address range of ZFS, that we would "literally 
evaporate all the oceans on earth". [...] Okay. The oceans are history! 
So are we. But ZFS will live forever.

			Dave Brillhart
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20090713/49e69c22/attachment-0001.pgp>