[arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?
oloringr at gmail.com
Mon Jul 13 05:18:06 EDT 2009
On Monday 13 July 2009 11:49, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
> to the dev:
> why not rename vi package to nvi ?
+1 to that
If we could implement a physical system with the storage capacity that
matches the 128-bit address range of ZFS, that we would "literally
evaporate all the oceans on earth". [...] Okay. The oceans are history!
So are we. But ZFS will live forever.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the arch-general