[arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?

[Magnus Therning]

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ed Jobs<oloringr at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday 13 July 2009 11:49, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
>> to the dev:
>> why not rename vi package to nvi ?
>
> +1 to that

Sounds like a good idea, especially since nvi _isn't_ vi in the strictest sense.

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning                        (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus＠therning．org          Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
http://therning.org/magnus         identi.ca|twitter: magthe