[arch-general] Help: assigning bugs for these type of tickets

Thomas Bächler thomas at archlinux.org
Thu Jul 23 10:34:36 EDT 2009

Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi schrieb:
> What about orphaned packages? My current rule is assign to the latest
> packager or commiter, but what about if this removes himself from the
> assignement? Can be a FR o BR both are important, if nobody take it,
> should be reported to mailing list and moved to community, so a TU can
> adopt it?
> What about packages that are reported as non-working because compiled
> with old libs or other issues, fails to build, and still on repos for
> many weeks/months. Report the FS to the mailing list for removing or
> move to unsupported?

I'll regret saying this, but for [core] packages, you can always add me 
(and probably Allan and Aaron) to the assignees in those cases.

For anything else that is unclear, I'd suggest asking on the mailing list.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20090723/9300c27d/attachment.pgp>

More information about the arch-general mailing list