[arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing requires intervention

[Thomas Bohn]

On 2009-05-05 19:20 +0200, tobias at justdreams.de wrote:

> the current vi package is actually nvi, the purpose of that was to have a 
> smaller package for core that also would not stall any updates of 
> vim/gvim while vi sits in testing.

I know that. That is why I'm asking. Either nvi or Vim. Both makes it 
complex.

> Th vim package is not uglier then it used to be before,

Well before was extremely ugly with this three different packages and a 
Vim wich didn't react like one, at least until someone found out that it 
needed .virc.

Thomas