[arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing requires intervention
Magnus Therning
magnus at therning.org
Tue May 12 01:25:43 EDT 2009
Dan McGee wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:22 AM, Tobias Kieslich <tobias at justdreams.de> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Finally, the new vi* packages are up. There will be a little migration
>>> pain. For optimal results, I recommend to "sudo rm /usr/bin/{view/rview}"
>>> before you run "sudo pacman -Syu"
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> dmcgee at galway ~
>> $ vim .vimrc
>> Error detected while processing /home/dmcgee/.vimrc:
>> line 64:
>> E185: Cannot find color scheme inkpot
>> Press ENTER or type command to continue
>>
>> dmcgee at galway ~
>> $ locate inkpot
>> /usr/share/vim/colors/inkpot.vim
>>
>> For reference, here is some of my .vimrc:
>>
>> " GUI/NONGUI SETTINGS "
>> if has("gui_running")
>> if has("gui_gtk2")
>> set guifont=DejaVu\ Sans\ Mono\ 12
>> endif
>> colorscheme desert
>> set columns=80 lines=40
>> else
>> colorscheme inkpot
>> endif
>>
>>
>> And a quick guess, it looks like the new vim package puts its colors here:
>> /usr/share/vim/vim72/colors/
>>
>> Any reason the old /usr/share/vim/ shouldn't be on the default runtimepath?
Looking at other distros it seems using /usr/share/vim/vimX is the place for
system-wide configurations. Not saying that's right or wrong.
/M
--
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus@therning.org Jabber: magnus@therning.org
http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20090512/f61e6288/attachment.pgp>
More information about the arch-general
mailing list