[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] List of packages that could be rebuilt if you have nothing better to do...

[Allan McRae]

Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> Allan McRae wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have created a list of packages the could use a rebuild but for
>> which there is no hurry.  These include packages without the arch in
>> their filename, packages containing a .FILELIST file, packages with
>> man pages in /usr/man or uncompress man and info pages.  See
>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Unimportant_Rebuild_List
>>
>> Do people think this is useful and should I move it to the DeveloperWiki?
>>
>> Allan
>>
>>     
> Good job.
>
> And for "Packages that can be converted to arch=any" sometime ago I
> sended a list of tentative packages [#1]. Its old and some of listed
> packages [#2] are now "any"
>
>
> [#1]
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-July/005960.html
> [#2] http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/misc/any.txt
>   

I'm being lazy...   any change you can easily generate an updated list 
for [core]/[extra]?  Don't worry about it if it will be a hassle.

Allan