[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] List of packages that could be rebuilt if you have nothing better to do...

[Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi]

Allan McRae wrote:
> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
>> Allan McRae wrote:
>>  
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have created a list of packages the could use a rebuild but for
>>> which there is no hurry.  These include packages without the arch in
>>> their filename, packages containing a .FILELIST file, packages with
>>> man pages in /usr/man or uncompress man and info pages.  See
>>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Unimportant_Rebuild_List
>>>
>>> Do people think this is useful and should I move it to the
>>> DeveloperWiki?
>>>
>>> Allan
>>>
>>>     
>> Good job.
>>
>> And for "Packages that can be converted to arch=any" sometime ago I
>> sended a list of tentative packages [#1]. Its old and some of listed
>> packages [#2] are now "any"
>>
>>
>> [#1]
>> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-July/005960.html
>> [#2] http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/misc/any.txt
>>   
>
> I'm being lazy...   any change you can easily generate an updated list
> for [core]/[extra]?  Don't worry about it if it will be a hassle.
>
> Allan
>
>
>
No problem, I can do a "light scan" making a difference between this
list and list of current packages.
I guess that doing again a "deep scan" don't make much sense,


Good Luck!

-- 
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera )
http://www.djgera.com.ar
KeyID: 0x1B8C330D
Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219  76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D