[arch-general] split packages documentation

Ali H. Caliskan ali.h.caliskan at gmail.com
Sat Sep 5 10:32:53 EDT 2009


Well, makepkg is script that I've studied, so it's capable of doing more
than what it should.  Here is an "bash" illustration of what PKGBUILD should
look like according to my opinion:

pkgname=('mesa', 'libgl', 'foopkg')
pkgver=('7.5.1', '7.5.1', '1.2')
pkgrel=2
pkgdesc=("Mesa 3-D graphics libraries and include files",
         "Mesa 3-D graphics library and DRI software rasterizer",
         "foo description of some foo package")
arch=(i686 x86_64)
depends=(('libgl' 'libx11>=1.2.2'
          'libxt' 'gcc-libs>=4.4.1'
          'dri2proto=2.1' 'libdrm>=2.4.13'),
         ('libdrm>=2.4.13' 'libxxf86vm>=1.0.99.1'
          'libxdamage>=1.1.1' 'expat>=2.0.1'), '')
makedepends=('glproto>=1.4.10' 'pkgconfig' 'libdrm>=2.4.13'
'libxxf86vm>=1.0.99.1' 'libxdamage>=1.1.1' 'expat>=2.0.1' 'libx11>=1.2.2'
'libxt>=1.0.6' 'gcc-libs>=4.4.1' 'dri2proto=2.1')
url="http://mesa3d.sourceforge.net"
license=('custom')
options=(!makeflags)
source=(
ftp://ftp.freedesktop.org/pub/mesa/${pkgver}/MesaLib-${pkgver}.tar.bz2

ftp://ftp.freedesktop.org/pub/mesa/${pkgver}/MesaDemos-${pkgver}.tar.bz2
        ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/mesa/gl-manpages-1.0.1.tar.bz2
...

#build() {

pkgsetup() {

basepkg = mesa

}

subsetup(libgl) {

build commands

}

subsetup(foopkg) {

build commands

}

On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Henning Garus
<henning.garus at googlemail.com>wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 02:46:49PM +0200, Ali H. Caliskan wrote:
> > Well I was referring to two packages with one PGKBUILD. Jan de Groot has
> > come closer to that idea, see [1]. Although I think it shoule be a single
> > pkgname field with pkg1, pkg1 names, and single pkgver, with pkgver1,
> > pkgver2 etc. while  the build section should have pkg1 pkg2, pkg3 etc.
>
> I don't really understand what you are referring to, are you proposing a
> different format for PKGBUILDS for splitpkgs? If so, an example and a list
> of
> advantages compared to the momentary format would go a long way.
>
> > Observe that pkg1 is the head section, while pkg2, pkg3 is subsection of
> the
> > build.
>
> Not really, first the pkgname array and common variables are defined, then
> follows the build function and a package_$pkgname function for each
> package.
>
> >I've implemented this concept with python, and it works.
>
> Please elaborate. What exactly have you implemented? And what does this
> implementation do, that makepkg 3.3 does not?
>
> >
> > 1:
> >
> http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/mesa/repos/extra-x86_64/PKGBUILD?revision=51142&view=markup
> >
>
> PS: Please do not top-post.
>


More information about the arch-general mailing list