[arch-general] Xz, space savings and delta ... my findings
kumyco at konnichi.com
Thu Apr 1 15:29:31 CEST 2010
On 01/04/10 14:03, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:54:56 +0100
> Nathan Wayde<kumyco at konnichi.com> wrote:
>> Comparing with the delta (between the original packages) which 5.3MB
>> it's not a whole lot while allowing more flexibility(IMHO).
> I don't see the point. with binary delta's you get smaller packages
> and getting the non-changed files "again" doesn't really cause harm,
> does it?
> In other words: what useful things does this approach allow you to do
> that we cannot do right now?
My use-case is for the downgrade scenario where you have upgraded,
then later you realize there is some problem and you no longer have any
Now, in theory I could simply rebuild the pkg with local files thus
saving the large download.
But what would be the point if I can simply get the files I need.
More information about the arch-general