[arch-general] 1. Re: version control system for normal user (Magnus Therning)
magnus at therning.org
Sat Aug 28 09:57:57 EDT 2010
On 28/08/10 11:45, Johannes Held wrote:
> José M. Prieto <jmprieto at gmx.net>:
>> Git is very powerful, but not the easier one to use. I'd suggest darcs
>> or mercurial better.
> I used Darcs for a while and I liked its "theory of patches". But at some point
> I was just fed up with having to decide about every line I changed.
You need to learn of the '-a' argument for 'darcs record' :-)
> With Git, I can stage selected changes and subsequently commit them, while in
> Mercurial I have not found any comparable feature.
True, but I still don't quite understand the point of the staging area.
never found a good use for it. In short, I don't think the staging area is
the feature that makes git a better option than Mercurial :-)
For Mercurial you have patch queues which you can use in a way that
to do stuff similarly to the staging area of git.
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the arch-general