[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [announcement] qemu/qemu-kvm announcement draft

Tobias Powalowski t.powa at gmx.de
Sun Jan 10 05:07:19 EST 2010


Am Sonntag 10 Januar 2010 schrieb Simon Boulay:
> On 01/10/2010 09:48 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Am Samstag 09 Januar 2010 schrieb Simon Boulay:
> >> On 01/09/2010 09:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> >>> Am Samstag 09 Januar 2010 schrieb Dan McGee:
> >>>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Tobias Powalowski<t.powa at gmx.de>   
wrote:
> >>>>>    >   Yes will change the install message.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes there is no mention in the changelogs, really strange.
> >>>>>> greetings
> >>>>>> tpowa
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ok like this?
> >>>>>    echo ">>>   Since kernel 2.6.29:"
> >>>>>    echo ">>>   Qemu package now provides standard qemu with kvm
> >>>>> enabled." echo ""
> >>>>>    echo ">>>   PLEASE READ FOR KVM USAGE!"
> >>>>>    echo ">>>    Load the correct KVM module, you will need a KVM
> >>>>> capable CPU!" echo ">>>    Add yourself to the group 'kvm'."
> >>>>>    echo ">>>    Use 'qemu --enable-kvm' to use KVM."
> >>>>>    echo ""
> >>>>>    echo "With the release of qemu and qemu-kvm 0.12.X, the kqemu
> >>>>> kernel module" echo "is no longer supported and will be removed from
> >>>>> the repositories. You" echo "can safely uninstall it from your
> >>>>> system."
> >>>>
> >>>> Can we put some vercmp checks around messages like this? That way
> >>>> people only have to see them once (when they upgrade the first time to
> >>>> a 0.12.x version for the second message). The first message should
> >>>> really be a post_install message.
> >>>>
> >>>> And with all that said, why are there two packages in extra if "qemu
> >>>> package now provides standard qemu with kvm enabled"?
> >>>>
> >>>> -Dan
> >>>
> >>> Yes sure i can add those vercmp stuff.
> >>> qemu and qemu-kvm is different.
> >>> qemu-kvm is only for  kvm while qemu provides much more machines to
> >>> emulate.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure about that. Both seems to share the same code for machine
> >> emulation; only the kvm stuff is different. In fedora 12, they build kvm
> >> and qemu-system-xxx from qemu-kvm 0.11. But I don't know how this will
> >> evolve in the future.
> >> If qemu and qemu-kvm are used for different purposes, one may need to
> >> install both apps side by side but that's not possible in archlinux.
> >
> > Why?
> > qemu is for those who need more different emulation types.
> > qemu-kvm is only for 86 emulation with kvm hardware support.
> > Both differ in files you would need to hack bios file destination etc.
> > I don't see any need to install both at the same time.
> 
> Because one may want to use x86 emulation with kvm hardware support and
> qemu-system-arm for example on the same machine.
> It is possible to build all targets with qemu-kvm but that's not the
> default and I don't know if that'll be the case for future release.
> For 0.11 release, qemu and qemu-kvm seems to converge, but with 0.12
> that's not so clear (at least to me). As I understand it, the
> development of platform emulation is done in qemu and kvm virtualization
> is done in qemu-kvm (even if qemu has some kvm support) but the qemu
> repository is regularly merged in qemu-kvm. I don't find any official
> statement about that, so...
normal qemu supports kvm too, just use --enable-kvm start parameter.
So no need to install qemu-kvm.
greetings
tpowa

-- 
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tpowa at archlinux.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20100110/1227ab4d/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the arch-general mailing list