[arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

[Brendan Long]

On 01/27/2010 08:00 AM, Thomas Jost wrote:
> Le 27/01/2010 15:56, Joerg Schilling a écrit :
>    
>> Thomas Jost<thomas.jost at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> [snip]
>> Well, someone in this list just told me that the rules for Arch Linux are that
>> someone from Cdrkit would need to prove that there is no legal problem with
>> cdrkit.
>>
>> Could we agree on a unique method for dealing with claims please?
>>
>> Jörg
>>
>>      
> You said earlier that "_you_ would first need to prove that there is a
> legal problem with the original software".
>
> You are telling cdrkit is illegal.
>
> Follow your own rule. Prove cdrkit to be illegal.
>
> If you can't, there's no point in continuing this discussion.
>
>    

Wait so if someone says that cdrtools is illegal, he has to prove that 
it's not, but if someone says that cdrkit is illegal, he has to prove 
that it is? Will you be my lawyer?