[arch-general] b43: wireless issues
Magnus Therning
magnus at therning.org
Sat Jun 19 18:35:36 EDT 2010
On 18/06/10 16:09, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
[...]
> I only read that stuff on their mailinglist and in some kernel log/mail that
> they're gonna change it to a module load time option in kernel .34. I don't
> know anything for sure. I don't think it reverts to PIO automatically, and I
> don't think it will.
I think it does. Since I do get connected long enough to start using the
network, even when the DMA-related error message pops up in dmesg.
> If you don't necessarily need the b43 driver then the broadcom thing in AUR
> should work without too much hassle. One of the annoying things with it is
> that you need to compile it against your kernel, so if you use multiple
> kernels you're in for fun. Another nuisance is that the wifi identifies
> itself as eth0 and wired as eth1. b43 is imho better in that respect, eth0
> for ethernet and wlan0 for wireless just makes more sense. I also had the
> broadcom driver sometimes stall my machine for a couple of seconds, usually
> after boot, which I consider bad behavior.
Yes, I just installed broadcom-wl from AUR, working fine so far. I'll stick
to it and move on to the next item of configuration on my laptop: suspend.
So far I always get a blank screen on resume, something I know has been
discussed on this list in the passed; I'm off to the archives.
Cheers,
M
--
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus@therning.org Jabber: magnus@therning.org
http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20100619/39e76a29/attachment.bin>
More information about the arch-general
mailing list