[arch-general] top posting

Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Fri Mar 5 16:50:33 CET 2010


On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Denis Kobozev <d.v.kobozev at gmail.com> wrote:
> Bottom posting shows its downside only when you recently joined a
> mailing list, for example - you start receiving emails from threads
> that have been going for a long time and you have no idea what people
> are discussing. But if you're really interested, you can always use
> the archive.

Top posting doesn't solve this, unless you're implying top posting
with no previous messages trimmed. If this is what you're implying you
need to compare apples-to-apples and assume the bottom-posted emails
will have no previous messages trimmed as well.

If this is the case, the bottom posting still wins as it has the
entire conversation history _in order_


More information about the arch-general mailing list